So... um... if nobody is going to react or write anything, let me. What should we do about this?

When I came to this site, most of the questions were well written, interesting, and enticed me to research even the things I was not an expert in. I sometimes even felt like reading questions completely different from my area (which is Computer vision and Image processing). Not any more...

I've also actively participated in the reviewing process up until a few months ago... but as the quality of questions visibly declined, the questions started lacking details, the language got worse, no effort was visible in the questions and the requests for details from established community members went unanswered, I stopped. Back when I review would take me 2-3-5 minutes per question, it was okay. But now, if I need to spend 10 minutes reviewing a question related to my field, and 20+ (or impossible) for other questions... I don't do it.

I used to come here for some stimulative problems when taking a break from my own work. They're slowly but steadily becoming less and less stimulating.

Some facts to support my claims:

  • this and the last self-evaluation not only produced bad results but barely got people participating
  • the last time I remember really enjoying the site (and, coincidentally, the last good self-eval was 6 months ago)
  • this site used to be at the brink on putting all stats in green on Area 51 (I remember), while now we're completely in orange except the number of users
  • I actively participate on another beta side, academia.SE. I remember when Academia used to be a baby compared to DSP. But, a site a year younger has managed to preserve the quality of the questions, increase all the stats, and basically, "grow up" while we are stagnating, or even declining.
  • I remember when we had above 90% answered questions. We tried to do something about it, but I don't think it really worked.

I care about this site. I think it's amazing to have a SE site in my topic, it helps me with my work, I use it for procrastination instead of facebookish things cause it re-directs my mind to other problems and keeps it sharp, I enjoy helping but... I feel like the site has to get back on track.

I am not a very experienced SE user (not very inexperienced either, but well..), so I don't really have any suggestions to improving the site, but it does seem to me that something has to be done. Does anybody else feel that way? Does anybody smarter than me have some suggestions?

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Hi penelope. I'm going to be looking over the evaluations this week and I hope I can offer some suggestions about what has worked elsewhere. Academia is a really great site, but it has a much larger potential audience. So I'd not spend too much time worrying about the relative differences. (Sounds like you are a structured procrastinator, which is awesome!) $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 26, 2013 at 13:23
  • $\begingroup$ @JonEricson I know you probably have a lot on your plate, but I wanted to follow up and see if you'd had a chance to look into this at some point. $\endgroup$
    – jonsca
    Commented Jan 6, 2014 at 21:54
  • $\begingroup$ I'm definitely concerned about this as well. Over the past few months I've been trying to polish some questions. I don't have the expertise to answer a lot of questions, but I have been here since the private beta, and I want to see the site succeed. $\endgroup$
    – jonsca
    Commented Jan 6, 2014 at 21:57
  • $\begingroup$ @jonsca: Thanks for the reminder. I kinda got sidetracked by the holiday and other things. But I haven't forgotten about y'all. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 6, 2014 at 21:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JonEricson It's that time of year, so it's totally understandable! :) $\endgroup$
    – jonsca
    Commented Jan 6, 2014 at 21:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hi penelope, I also use SE to procrastinate, like, right now! :) But I have found myself not frequenting DSP.SE that often lately. Over at electronics.SE I also notice that there are also lot of 1 rep questions where the OP never returns to follow up. It is frustrating. They seem to deal with it by closing questions that don't meet the standard almost immediately. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 23, 2014 at 22:24

5 Answers 5


Noise in the data

Let's start with the most obvious thing: we don't have a lot of data. The most discouraging thing about the September evaluation was that the number of evaluators dropped from 7 to 3. The December eval was completed by 4 people. With so few people looking at questions, it's not surprising that voting will be noisy.

Since April, there have been about 600 questions/quarter. Of those, only 10 are represented in each evaluation. (The sample does not include unanswered, downvoted, or closed questions.) So an especially good or bad sample won't tell the full story. It's possible we got unlucky with the questions selected.

Too few reviewers

We collect data on how many people are active on the site 5 times or more in a month as a rough estimate of user engagement. In the last year, that number has hovered around 45. These are the people who are most likely to participate in self-evaluations. We also measure people who post on the site at least once. These more casual visitors have more or less doubled (to about 400) in the last 12 months. Naturally, the number of posts has also roughly doubled in that period.

One thing that can happen on a site is that contributions from newer users can overwhelm site regulars. When that happens basic cleanup tasks can suffer. It's one of the reasons we shut down sites:

This is one of the biggest problems with “quiet” sites already—not enough activity for the posts to be reviewed, ranked, and updated. We saw this with the SE 1.0 sites, where eventually the task wore out even [the] tiny handful of users who remained.

I hasten to add that we aren't looking to close down Signal Processing. But I'm concerned that there aren't enough people voting on and reviewing content.

Vote Early, Vote Often

I don't mean to vote like a Chicagoan, but to make use of your daily quota. There are two huge benefits:

  1. Answers will get properly sorted.
  2. Good contributors will be motivated and empowered to play a more prominent role on the site.

Feedback of any sort (upvotes, comments, and even downvotes) encourage engagement with the site. When exceptional posts come along, feel free to encourage others to vote via a comment.

I took some time graphing votes per post by month:

DSP votes per post

Stack Overflow saw a similar drop from 2009 to 2011. We aren't yet sure what changed things there, but it should be a lot easier to reverse the trend on a smaller site, such as this one.

  • $\begingroup$ Would it be possible to put this up as community bulletin? It might help more people to see this. $\endgroup$
    – penelope
    Commented Jan 9, 2014 at 10:40
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ And about the graph... I can explain my reasoning for voting less: I vote up good, researched questions, and vote down bad ones. But, there is loads of not-good-or-bad questions lately: they're interesting enough (or at least, mildly interesting), but they show no research effort. They're not for deletion or even worth a downvote, but they're definitely not deserving an upvote. Also, the really bad ones, I usually just vote to close or flag for deletion, instead of voting. $\endgroup$
    – penelope
    Commented Jan 16, 2014 at 8:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @penelope: That's a good point. The problem with the questions and answers this time around is that they are kinda "meh". I'd encourage you to consider tightening your standards on posts that are worse than what you'd like to see on the site and editing to improve posts to earn an upvote when you can. When you do find those rare gems, shout their praise from the <strike>rooftops</strike> comments. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 16, 2014 at 17:03

I'll give you my perspective as a semi-frequent user who isn't part of the community. The site seems kind of dead, which is surprising for a beta with 4,500 visits per day and 260 'avid' users. The two questions I've asked (here and here) both received 1 answer (both fine answers) from users with relatively low reputation. Where are all the 1k+ users? Why does the front page have 50% or more questions with 0 votes? You guys need to wake up.

At physics.SE we have ~15 truly avid users who combined answer 50% of the questions (my impression, not actual data). I'm not one of them, and I think some of them are crazy, but they make up a significant portion of the community activity. We also make an effort to answer even the questions which seem borderline infantile to a professional physicist.

I like this SE because it is a place for me to learn about a field which I use but have never had the time to study in detail. You guys just need to start doing things; anything. Vote up, vote down, mark duplicates, delete low quality posts, edit questions, answer questions, just do something.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, yes, I know, I know it is dead. But, the thing is, whenever I get the urge to resurrect it, and I try doing something, I keep at it for a few days and then I stop, since I can not change the general apathy on the site. So, yes, I do agree we need to start doing something quickly, I'm just wondering if we could do something (semi-)organized to encourage people who (were) active to re-activate themselves. Btw, the situation you describe about physics.SE was what this used to be like when I joined. $\endgroup$
    – penelope
    Commented Mar 6, 2014 at 13:43

A possibility: May be there aren't that many interesting new DSP questions. People keep asking the same newbe/broad questions and asking more deep/to-the-point questions takes much more effort than on other sites.

What might help - although I don't think it's practical in SE - is to have an online DSP IDE which will make the question askers and answerer's job easier. It can be a huge library of DSP routines and will help in quickly coding and showing something by example.

  • $\begingroup$ I agree that the new questions seem not as interesting, and not as well-researched as the old ones. But, this should be a site about approaches, theory, stuff like that -- I don't think working examples are necessary or even possible for the real interesting questions. $\endgroup$
    – penelope
    Commented Jan 16, 2014 at 8:50
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @user13107: I disagree that there aren't interesting DSP questions. I feel like, for whatever reason, this particular forum draws in a lot of "newbie" questions that show very little effort. Look no further than someplace like comp.dsp for very rich discussion on various topics from people who are very skilled in the field. We have some of those regulars who post here, but not many. I prefer this setting because of the improved exposition available with plots and typesetting, and the moderated atmosphere, which filters out the incendiary behavior that you sometimes see on newsgroups. $\endgroup$
    – Jason R
    Commented Jan 30, 2014 at 12:35

If I may bring up one thing for image processing as I am mostly interested in the area in this site, many people seem to misunderstand that single script or single method of image processing would work for their problem and thus is generally a target they look for. But proper image processing should not be treated that way. Like data analysis, proper procedure of image processing might be

  1. you should know circumstance, assumptions, restrictions, and any other useful information on the images,
  2. simplify the problems into smaller problems or tasks
  3. appropriately preprocess the images for each task
  4. build algorithm to resolve those smaller problems with various methods and models
  5. validate your algorithm with more similar images
  6. check the result to see if there is anything to improve algorithm

Many of questioners on image processing, however, post a single image or its description and ask how to achieve their goal without mentioning facts, assumptions & restrictions on image acquisition. They simply ask for a script or a method to solve their problems so it's very hard to answer because there can't no right answer and at best an opinion in those cases. As I don't know how to handle those questions, I am currently avoiding them because I cannot learn anything from answering them.


Biggest turnoff on the site right now is the recent flood of homework questions. They are usually put in here without any effort on both, trying to solve it and trying a good question style. Sometimes it's just a bad phone photo of the question from the textbook.

Due to their academic nature, the questions are more often than not very uninteresting. You can rarely learn something new from their answer and answering them is also not very challenging (and would just encourage more of them anyways).

  • $\begingroup$ I... wouldn't know any more. The general apathy has taken over me as well. I've not been on the site for at least a couple of weeks now, cause at least a month prior, whenever I came, all the questions had 0 to 1 upvotes, were uninteresting, bad quality, bad formatting, no investments from the OP... so I lost the will to invest myself. $\endgroup$
    – penelope
    Commented Apr 4, 2014 at 7:33
  • $\begingroup$ Also, as you might notice, this question is almost 4 months old now, asked last year... it's even been "featured" for a while. And people have just started answering and noticing it... last month. Which also speaks volumes all in itself. $\endgroup$
    – penelope
    Commented Apr 4, 2014 at 7:36

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .