2 votes
Accepted

Questions on the usefulness or validity of published signal/image processing techniques

Provided the information could be posed in a Q&A style format, I think this is OK. It's perfectly OK to answer your own questions, so this might be one case where this is a good idea. I know I ...
  • 23.1k
1 vote

How to handle mismatch between a quantum phase noise question and the current answer? "...because this is a DSP group, and 'quantum' is about physics"

The reason for my partial answer and my comment is that I'm not sure what "quantum noise" means in this context, and because the group is about signal processing it's out of scope to expect ...
  • 9,136
1 vote

Signal Processing or Computer Science or Statistics?

Your SE.DSP question is still not clear to me: Is there an ordinal variable (e.g. time) to help you with separating latent variables? Or is the problem purely instantaneous? How can you quantify "...
1 vote

Questions on the usefulness or validity of published signal/image processing techniques

The rules appear to allow such questions if you state them the right way. Quoting Signal Processing Stack Exchange help center: Some subjective questions are allowed, but “subjective” does not mean ...

Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible