Tag Info

I agree. I've performed this merge and created a synonym so that hilbert will be matched to hilbert-transform in the future.

Merged compressed-sensing onto compressive-sensing because there are many more compressive-sensing than compressed-sensing questions (88 vs 16) and all 16 compressed-sensing are double-tagged with compressive-sensing. Also made compressed-sensing a synonym of compressive-sensing, it shouldn't reappear.

I agree. I've merged them, and it re-tagged 9 questions from iq to quadrature.

Done!

As I am studying dimension reduction methods, @OlliNiemitalo answer triggered my curiosity. I pushed the study to rank 30, and the answer/reputation graph looks like: No drastic change in the trend. However, more points cluster at the bottom. So I tried with other easy to reach variables: Reputation, #Month (of presence), #Answers, #Questions, #...

Answer a lot and answer well? Some statistics: Figure 1. Number of answers and reputation of all-time top 20 users, with a trendline fit to the data.

You're right, these are synonymous. I've created a synonym suggestion, and users with a few answers on the tag can vote for it. I believe since this is really just a matter of expanding an acronym, a moderator might be able to expedite the process.

Done! I had to merge survailence onto surveillance, which seems to have the effect of renaming it.

So far, we'd have: signal processing signal-processing (which probably is already blacklisted) dsp (which probably is already blacklisted) We might want to: replace ~-processing with just "~" image- audio- video-

Certainly, that is something we could do. However, I think we must remember to avoid questions specific to Mathematica. There is a topic about it. As for mass tagging, I am not sure if it's possible. I would have to check on that one. Anyway, I've created a tag so feel free to use it. I've been thinking whether to use wolfram/wolfram-language, but ...

Done! I also swapped the stft tag with its longer counterpart to go with this way of doing things.

OK, I've made the change you suggest. Older Answer Below I'd be tempted to go the other way: keep adc and dac and make the longer forms synonyms. Mainly because the shorter forms include "c" (for convertor), and adding that to the longer forms would make them a little long.

Cleaning tags or giving them some distinct content is a good idea. However, I have the feeling that algorithms, reference-request, measurement are useful to me, unless you propose a replacement? I may have added those tags to first posts, or when editing. I believe that tags should be considered by the relations, with respect to antonyms, dual, or ...